Insurance Company Valuation Rule of Thumb

No Comments

One rule of thumb for valuing an insurance company is to apply a multiple to Statutory Policyholder Surplus. In recent years (2002-2005) this has been between 1x and 2x.

Steady Growth Business Valuation Rule of Thumb

No Comments

For a company that is growing at a steady-state rate, 10x EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, see rule of thumb: Cash Flow). This is essentially providing you with a proxy for a financial valuation theory known as the Dividend Growth Model. This theory states the value of a company is given by dividing its annual cash flow by the appropriate discount rate less the company s growth rate. Therefore, the 10x EBITDA rule of thumb comes from dividing the current years estimated cash flow by a 10% (net of growth) discount rate.

Cash Flow Rule of Thumb

No Comments

Cash flow can be estimated by the financial measurement known as EBITDA. EBITDA is used as a rule of thumb for cash flow. It stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Essentially, it estimates cash flow by trying to add back all non-cash expenses to a firm s net income. However, since it doesn t take into account capital expenditures or changes in net working capital, it should be used only as an estimate and works best with companies that are in a steady-state.

Venture Capital Valuation Rule of Thumb

No Comments

A helpful post on the methodology behind venture capital valuations. This post written by a VC describes the philosophy and business rationale for how venture capitalists arrive at valuations. http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2004/07/valuation.html

Venture Capital Market Size Criteria Rule of Thumb

3 Comments

Venture capitalists typically seek a 5x-10x return on their investment. I have used a Rule of Thumb I have coined the “Factors of 10′s”. It goes like this: If a VC wants a 10x return on a $6 million investment (for, say, 60% of the company)

  • The VC would need to cash out at $60 million
  • Which implies that the company would have to be worth $100 million when sold
  • And the entrepreneur’s company aims for 10% of the addressable market
  • The company would need revenues of perhaps $50 million (for a valuation of 2x Revenue)
  • Which implies a total addressable market size of $500 million, or an addressable market of 10x the company’s revenues.

This is based on a lot of broad assumptions, especially that the company would not need any further funding.

Newer Entries